Skip to main content
Two free guides. One small creative adventure. Start your adventure here!

Tag: Personal Reflection

Warp Chat: Which Sci-Fi Universe Would You Actually Want to Live In?

Posted on by

I love science fiction because it lets us go somewhere impossible without actually having to deal with the consequences.

You can visit Arrakis.

You can walk onto a Federation starship.

You can wander through Coruscant, poke around an abandoned alien station, or watch somebody open a portal that is very obviously going to become a problem.

Then you close the book or turn off the screen and go make dinner.

Which raises a much more interesting question.

What if you could not leave?

That is where I want to start Warp Chat, a weekly Epic Again discussion built around the questions science fiction leaves rattling around after the story is over.

And the first one is pretty simple:

Which sci-fi universe would you actually want to live in, and which one would be an absolute nightmare?

There is one rule.

You are not the hero.

No secret powers.

No mysterious destiny.

No plot armor.

You are just some person who lives there.

You need somewhere to sleep. You probably have neighbors. You might need a job. You have to figure out transportation, healthcare, food, taxes, local laws, and whether the giant object in the sky is normal or a reason to start running.

That changes the answer pretty quickly.

A great story does not always make a great place to live

A lot of my favorite science-fiction universes would be terrible places to actually wake up in.

That is not a flaw.

Most of them are interesting because something has gone wrong.

There are wars.

Governments are collapsing.

Corporations have way too much power.

Ancient machines are waking up.

Somebody has opened the sealed door everybody was specifically told not to open.

Great story.

Terrible Tuesday.

That is the distinction I keep coming back to.

There are worlds I love reading about that I would never, under any circumstances, move my family into.

Adventure is fun when you know the credits eventually roll.

Living there means asking different questions.

Is the hospital good?

Can I walk outside at night?

Does the government occasionally vaporize cities?

How often do ancient cosmic beings return?

These things matter.

The Culture is probably the easy answer

If I had to pick a universe based purely on quality of life, Iain M. Banks’ Culture is hard to beat.

It is basically post-scarcity.

Food is handled.

Housing is handled.

Medicine is absurdly advanced.

You can travel, make art, study something for two hundred years, change your body, do nothing for a while, or disappear into some bizarre hobby nobody else understands.

Honestly, that sounds pretty good.

The catch is that much of the civilization is managed by incredibly powerful artificial intelligences called Minds.

And I mean incredibly powerful.

They are smarter than you.

They know more than you.

They are better at running almost everything than you.

That is where my answer gets a little less automatic.

I like the Culture.

I am not completely sure how comfortable I would be living inside a society where the machine running the ship could probably predict what I am going to do before I have finished deciding to do it.

Still, if the alternative is getting drafted into an interstellar war somewhere else, I can probably learn to live with the sarcastic spaceship.

Star Trek is probably where I would actually choose

The Federation is the answer I keep landing on.

Maybe that is boring.

I am fine with boring.

Replicators exist.

Healthcare is wildly better than ours.

People are generally educated.

Basic survival does not seem to dominate every waking moment.

Humanity has somehow managed to move beyond at least some of the dumb things we currently spend our time fighting over.

You can also explore the galaxy if that is your thing.

Personally?

I am not sure I am joining Starfleet.

Watching Star Trek makes starship life look exciting because the camera follows the interesting people.

The camera does not spend much time with the crew member who gets assigned to Deck 14 right before something tears through the hull.

I think I would be perfectly happy on a nice Federation world.

Maybe visit a starbase.

Look at some ships.

Drink something weird at Quark’s.

Then go home.

I have kids. My tolerance for surprise alien invasions has gone down.

Star Wars looks much worse when you are not a Jedi

I love the Star Wars galaxy.

I absolutely do not want to live there.

At least not during most of the eras we actually see.

The galaxy looks incredible from a distance.

Thousands of worlds.

Ancient civilizations.

Spaceports.

Droids.

Ships everywhere.

Alien cultures.

You could probably find some quiet planet, start over, and disappear.

That part is appealing.

Unfortunately, the political situation is almost always a disaster.

The Republic collapses.

The Empire takes over.

Then the Empire collapses.

Then everybody has to figure out what comes next.

Then somehow there is another giant authoritarian military force with an even bigger superweapon.

At some point I am moving somewhere without strategic value and hoping nobody discovers it.

That is also the thing about Star Wars.

We imagine ourselves as Han Solo.

Statistically, we are much more likely to be the guy whose speeder gets destroyed because the protagonists were having a chase scene through his neighborhood.

Firefly is cool until you need a dentist

The Firefly universe has a kind of life I find weirdly appealing.

Small ship.

Small crew.

Fix your own stuff.

Take jobs.

Move around.

Eat together.

Try to stay out of trouble.

There is something human about it.

It feels dirty and patched together in a way that makes the world easy to imagine living inside.

Then I remember the part where the whole system is deeply unequal.

Healthcare is not exactly guaranteed.

The Alliance can be oppressive.

Some colonies are barely hanging on.

And there are Reavers.

So maybe I like the idea of living on Serenity more than the actual reality.

Give me the ship.

Give me the kitchen table.

Give me the found family.

Maybe also give me Federation medical care.

I am already cheating.

Stargate might actually be manageable

The Stargate universe is a strange one because your answer depends almost entirely on whether you know what is happening.

If you are an ordinary civilian on Earth, life could be pretty normal.

You go to work.

You complain about traffic.

You have no idea that somebody was fighting an alien god through a giant ring yesterday.

That might actually be the best arrangement.

The problem starts when you join Stargate Command.

Now every week somebody asks you to walk through a portal to an unknown planet where absolutely nobody can guarantee there will be breathable air, friendly locals, or a functioning return trip.

I love exploration.

I am also pretty attached to coming home.

So I think I would stay Earth-side.

Maybe give me a job somewhere near the program.

Not too near.

Warhammer 40,000 is an immediate no

There is no debate here.

I love Warhammer 40,000.

I paint the miniatures.

I like the lore.

I enjoy how completely excessive the entire setting is.

I do not want to live there.

At all.

There are almost no good outcomes.

You might live on a hive world where billions of people are stacked on top of each other.

You might end up on some brutal industrial planet.

You could get drafted.

You could meet aliens.

You could meet Chaos.

You could discover that your neighbor has been worshipping something with too many arms.

The Imperium itself is hardly reassuring.

Even the people supposedly protecting humanity are part of a gigantic authoritarian machine fueled by war, fear, religion, sacrifice, and paperwork.

And that is before the Tyranids arrive.

This is a universe where “quiet farming planet” feels less like a lifestyle and more like the opening twenty minutes before something horrible happens.

Wonderful fiction.

Hard pass.

The Alien universe is almost worse because it feels normal

Warhammer 40,000 is so enormous and grotesque that it almost becomes abstract.

Alien bothers me more because I can imagine working there.

That is the problem.

You are not some legendary warrior.

You work for a company.

You have a contract.

There are safety procedures.

The equipment is old.

Your employer keeps sending people into situations it definitely knows are dangerous.

That part feels believable.

Then somebody finds the egg.

No.

Absolutely not.

The moment anyone says, “We found some kind of biological specimen,” I am resigning.

Weyland-Yutani can keep the pension.

The Matrix might be the worst answer because you may already be trapped

The Matrix gets ugly once you remove the cool coats and martial arts.

Most people are not Neo.

They are batteries.

Worse, they do not even know it.

That hits differently from a universe where you can at least see the monster coming.

In Alien, I know there is a xenomorph.

In Warhammer, I know something awful is happening because the sky has turned red and people are screaming about daemons.

Inside the Matrix, I could have a completely normal morning and never realize my entire reality is artificial.

That is terrifying.

I think I would rather know the problem exists.

Probably.

Ask me again after I see the real world outside the simulation.

Black Mirror scares me for another reason

Black Mirror might be the most uncomfortable answer on this list because it rarely feels very far away.

Nobody needs to invent faster-than-light travel.

There does not need to be an alien invasion.

Somebody creates a useful new piece of technology.

People adopt it.

Companies find ways to make money from it.

Society decides this is normal.

Then, somewhere along the way, everyone realizes the thing has changed human behavior in ways nobody really planned for.

That is much harder to dismiss.

I can look at Warhammer 40,000 and say, “Well, at least we do not have Chaos Gods.”

Black Mirror occasionally feels more like somebody moved one slider five years forward.

I don’t like that nearly as much.

The ordinary life test changes everything

The more I think about this question, the less interested I am in what universe has the coolest technology.

I want to know what my day looks like.

Where do I live?

What does breakfast cost?

Can my kids go outside?

Is medicine available?

Do I have time to make things?

Can I travel?

Does some enormous government monitor everything I do?

Is artificial intelligence helpful, dangerous, or both?

How often does somebody accidentally wake up an ancient enemy?

That is where worldbuilding gets interesting for me.

The giant fleet is cool.

The map is cool.

The twenty-thousand-year timeline is cool.

But eventually somebody has to take the trash out.

What does that life feel like?

That is the question that makes a fictional place turn into an actual world.

It is also something I keep thinking about while building the Original Universe here at Epic Again.

Big empires and ancient history are fun to design.

I can lose hours doing that.

The harder part is figuring out what it means to be some ordinary person living underneath all of it.

That is where I think a setting really starts working.

You can find more of those conversations in the science-fiction section, along with more of my ongoing worldbuilding and the Epic Again podcast.

Your Turn: Warp Chat #1

So now I want your answer.

And remember, you actually have to live there.

Give me three things:

  1. The science-fiction universe you would choose
  2. What you would actually do there
  3. The universe you would refuse to live in

You do not get to say you are a Jedi unless your normal life already suggests that mysterious space wizards are recruiting you.

You do not automatically get a starship.

You are probably not saving the galaxy.

Pick the world where you would actually want to wake up on an ordinary Tuesday.

For me, I think I am taking the Federation.

Nice planet.

Replicator.

Good healthcare.

Occasional trip to a starbase.

And I am staying very, very far away from Warhammer 40,000.

Your turn.

Science Fiction and Identity: Why It Still Feels Like Home

Posted on by
I keep coming back to science fiction. Not necessarily the same books, movies, games, or fictional universes. Some stay with me longer than others. Some change when I come back to them. A few probably survive better in memory than they do under close inspection years later. But the genre itself never really seems to leave. Give me a ruined civilization, an impossible machine, a distant world, a collapsing empire, or a messy argument about whether something that looks human actually is human, and I’m interested. There is something familiar about those stories even when everything inside them is deliberately strange. That is probably why science fiction still feels a little like home.

At Some Point, Stories Stop Being Things You Watched

There are stories you enjoy and move on from. Then there are stories that somehow become part of the equipment you use to understand every story that comes afterward. You recognize ideas because you’ve seen another version of them before. New worlds remind you of old ones. A character makes a choice and somewhere in the back of your head another character from another story is standing there making the opposite one. The references accumulate. Eventually, being a lifelong science fiction fan isn’t just a list of things you have watched or read. Those stories become part of your vocabulary. And I don’t mean trivia. Knowing the designation of every spaceship in a fictional navy is certainly a kind of knowledge, although perhaps one best deployed carefully at dinner parties. I mean the ideas underneath it. The questions. The types of worlds that immediately make sense to you because you’ve spent so much time wandering around inside variations of them. There is actual research behind the idea that fiction can become entangled with the way we understand ourselves. Work on fiction reading and narrative identity has explored how fictional stories can interact with memories, emotions, and the stories people construct about their own lives. I don’t need science to tell me that a good story can stick with someone. But it is interesting that the sticking part may be more important than we usually admit.
Some stories stop being things you consumed. They become part of the language you use to understand everything that comes after them.

Science Fiction Gave Me Questions Bigger Than the Spaceships

To be clear, the spaceships help. I am not above a good spaceship. But the thing that keeps pulling me toward science fiction isn’t really the technology. It’s what the genre gets to do with it. Science fiction can take a question we already have and make it enormous. What makes someone human? Now make a machine that remembers being human. What happens when political power becomes too concentrated? Now stretch the empire across thousands of worlds. What happens when technology advances faster than our ability to decide whether we should use it? Give humanity another twenty thousand years and see how badly we can complicate the answer. This is one reason questions of identity are so persistent in science fiction. The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction‘s entry on identity runs through clones, memory changes, cyborgs, uploaded minds, duplicated people, parallel selves, and all the other cheerful ways the genre has found to make “Who am I?” substantially more difficult. And that is just one question. Science fiction gives us room to ask what happens to faith when civilization changes beyond recognition. Whether progress actually makes people better. What survives when institutions collapse. What happens when survival requires a moral compromise. Whether humanity can escape the same cycles if we just move them to another planet. Sometimes the answer is hopeful. Sometimes everyone is eaten. It’s a flexible genre.

The Worlds I Keep Circling Back To Aren’t Very Much Alike

This is part of what makes trying to explain a lifelong attachment to science fiction difficult. “Science fiction” covers an absurd amount of territory. Dune, Blade Runner, and Warhammer 40,000 can all fit somewhere beneath the same enormous genre umbrella, but they are doing very different things once you get underneath the machinery. And I think that difference is part of the appeal.

Dune Makes the Future Feel Ancient

One of the things that stands out to me about Dune is how little its distant future feels like the clean technological future we are often promised. It is full of old houses, inherited power, religion, ritual, prophecy, political marriages, human ambition, and institutions that have had enough time to become almost geological. The technology is futuristic. The people remain extremely human. That is more interesting to me than a future where technical progress conveniently solves all the old problems. Civilization can invent astonishing things and still carry pride, greed, faith, fear, loyalty, tribalism, love, and the desire for power right along with it. Apparently those fit in the luggage.

Blade Runner Turns Humanity Into the Question

Blade Runner comes at science fiction from somewhere else entirely. Its technology matters, but the more interesting problem is what happens when the distinction between a manufactured person and a “real” person becomes harder to defend than everyone would prefer. Memory. Mortality. Empathy. Creation. Identity. The machinery exists to make those questions unavoidable. That kind of science fiction sticks with me because the speculative idea isn’t merely there to make the world look different. It puts pressure on something we already believe.

Warhammer 40K Asks What Happens When Everything Goes Wrong

Warhammer 40,000 takes a somewhat less restrained approach. Humanity reaches the distant future and discovers that nearly every problem can, in fact, become worse. Much worse. But underneath the enormous armies, impossible scale, religious imagery, alien civilizations, psychic horrors, and machinery decorated with a statistically concerning number of skulls, there are still recognizable questions. What happens when institutions survive longer than anyone remembers why they existed? What does faith look like when it becomes inseparable from political power? What happens when survival becomes the justification for almost anything? What parts of humanity survive an empire that has forgotten most of its own history? The setting exaggerates everything until it becomes grotesque. And sometimes exaggeration makes an idea easier to see.

Coming Back to Old Science Fiction Is a Strange Experience

The interesting thing about returning to old stories is that the story has been sitting there doing absolutely nothing. You are the thing that changed. That can be inconvenient. Something that once seemed incredibly profound may suddenly sound like it was written by a philosophy student who discovered Nietzsche two hours ago. Characters you barely noticed can become the most interesting people in the story. A straightforward hero can look more complicated. A villain’s argument can become more understandable without becoming correct. And themes that went straight past you before can suddenly become impossible to miss. That’s one reason I don’t think sci-fi nostalgia is quite enough to explain why these stories keep mattering. Nostalgia wants the old thing to remain exactly where we left it. Good science fiction often doesn’t cooperate. You bring more life back with you every time you return. Family. Work. Faith. Failure. Responsibility. Things you’ve learned. Things you were very certain about before discovering that certainty was doing most of the work. The story hasn’t grown up. You have.
The story hasn’t changed. You bring a different person back to it.

Being a Science Fiction Fan Becomes Its Own Language

Spend enough time around science fiction and you start collecting a weird shared vocabulary. Not literally the vocabulary, although there is plenty of that too. The references. The visual shorthand. The arguments that apparently have no natural end point. You can tell another fan that something feels very Dune, very cyberpunk, very Star Trek, very grimdark, or suspiciously like someone reinvented a concept science fiction writers have been worrying about since before either of you were born. And they probably know what you mean. Fandom becomes a kind of shared cultural memory. That doesn’t mean everyone likes the same things. If anything, science fiction fandom has produced heroic amounts of disagreement over stories about imaginary futures. But even the arguments come from caring about the same broad territory. The ships matter because somebody imagined them. The lore matters because we spent time learning it. The stories matter because they gave us something worth arguing about afterward. At a certain point, saying “I’m a science fiction fan” tells people something about you that goes beyond a preferred shelf at the bookstore.

Science Fiction Also Taught Me What I Want to Create

This is probably where science fiction connects most directly to what I’m doing with EpicAgain now. There is a point where consuming fictional worlds starts creating another urge. You start wondering how they were built. Why this civilization works the way it does. Why the writer chose this technology but rejected another. What assumptions are hiding underneath the setting. What you would change. What question you would ask instead. And eventually, at least for me, looking at other people’s worlds makes me want to build some of my own. That is a big part of why worldbuilding has a place inside EpicAgain. I don’t want to reproduce Dune, Blade Runner, Warhammer 40,000, or any of the other things feeding the creative machine. I want to understand why parts of those worlds work, what questions underneath them continue to bother me, and then push those questions somewhere else. That is also what I’m beginning to do through the original universe I’m building here. Science fiction gave me worlds to explore for years. Now I want to see what happens when I start building one.

Home Doesn’t Have to Mean Comfortable

Calling science fiction “home” sounds warmer than a lot of science fiction deserves. There are dying worlds. Totalitarian states. Body horror. Alien parasites. Machines asking uncomfortable questions about personhood. Entire civilizations making decisions that suggest somebody should perhaps confiscate the keys. Cozy. But I don’t mean home as comfort. I mean recognition. I know this territory. I know the kinds of questions hiding behind the impossible technology and ruined civilizations. I recognize the curiosity that drives someone to imagine a world that doesn’t exist and then spend an unreasonable amount of time deciding how its transportation system works. The details change. The scale changes. The future changes. The urge behind it feels familiar.
Science fiction feels like home not because it is comfortable. It feels like home because my imagination recognizes the territory.

I’m Still Looking for the Next One

There is a trap waiting for anyone who has loved something for a long time. You can start believing the best version of it already happened. The best movies were the ones you grew up with. The best books were the ones you found at exactly the right age. Everything new gets judged against a memory with twenty years of polishing behind it. I don’t want to do that. Part of The Creative Return is going back to things that mattered to me, but the point isn’t to live there. I want to find new stories too. New writers. New worlds. New ideas that make me reconsider old ones. Stories that irritate me for interesting reasons. Stories that do something I would never have thought to do myself. And somewhere in all of that, I want to make some stories of my own. Maybe that is the real reason science fiction still feels like home. I know this kind of place. I still don’t know what I’ll find in the next room. “`

Returning to Creativity: Why I’m Making EpicAgain

Posted on by

Life got busy. The imagination never left. I don’t think I ever stopped being creative. I just stopped making enough things. There is a difference between those two ideas, though it took me a while to notice it. The interests were still there. Stories still pulled me in. Games, art, strange worlds, history, miniatures, writing, design, and all the other things that make my brain wander off somewhere interesting never really disappeared. But actually creating something of my own? That got pushed further and further down the list. Life has a pretty effective system for doing that. Work needs attention. Family needs attention. The house needs something. There is another practice, appointment, project, deadline, bill, email, or small domestic emergency involving an object that worked perfectly yesterday. None of those things are bad. Most of them matter quite a bit. But somewhere in all of that, I started missing a part of myself I hadn’t realized I was neglecting. That is a big part of why I’m making EpicAgain.

I Don’t Think Creativity Ever Really Left

When people talk about returning to creativity, it can sound like creativity is something we completely lose. I’m not sure that’s what happened to me. I never stopped being interested in creative things. If anything, I probably surrounded myself with more of them. Books. Games. Movies. Art. Miniatures. Ideas. Projects I wanted to try. Things I wanted to learn. Stories that sent my brain down completely unnecessary rabbit holes for the next three days. The problem was that enjoying creative things and making creative things slowly became two different parts of my life. Consuming is easy to fit into the cracks. You can watch something after everyone goes to bed. Read a few pages. Scroll through somebody else’s artwork. Look at a beautifully painted miniature and confidently think, I should try that sometime. Sometime is very accommodating. It never complains when you move something there. Creating asks a little more from you. You have to start, you have to make choices. You have to be bad at something for a while. Sometimes you need space, tools, uninterrupted time, or enough mental energy left at the end of the day to form a coherent thought. And slowly, without making any deliberate decision to stop, I made less.

I don’t think the creative part disappeared. I think it got crowded.

Life Got Busy. Then It Stayed Busy.

There was no dramatic moment when I packed away creativity and announced that adulthood had officially begun. That would almost be easier. Instead, responsibilities accumulated in the very ordinary way they tend to. Career. Family. Schedules. Commitments. Things that needed to be handled because I was the person who needed to handle them. One season of life rolls into another, and eventually you realize something you meant to get back to has been waiting for years. I think that happens to a lot of adults. Especially when we start treating creative work as the thing we are allowed to do once everything else is finished. That sounds responsible. It is also a fantastic way to never create anything again. Because everything else is never finished. There will always be laundry, always be work, always be another email somebody decided was urgent at 4:47 on a Friday afternoon. There will always be a reason that tonight would be easier if you just watched something instead. And again, none of this makes adulthood the enemy. I like my life. The people and responsibilities filling it are not obstacles standing between me and some imaginary pure creative existence. I’m not trying to escape them so I can retreat to a candlelit tower and finally finish my masterpiece while somebody else figures out what the kids are eating. That isn’t the point.

If creativity matters, it probably has to exist inside the life I actually have. Not the life I might have once things calm down.

That question, how to make creativity fit inside a life that is already full, is something I want to keep exploring through Making Time to Create.

My Kids Made Me Notice What Was Missing

One of the strange things about becoming a parent is getting a front-row seat to imagination before adulthood has had much chance to organize it. Kids don’t need everything to have a purpose. They can become interested in something because it is interesting. Kids can make something because making it sounds fun. They can care deeply about an idea that has absolutely no measurable effect on quarterly performance. There is something refreshing about that. And watching my kids has made me think more about my own relationship with creativity. Not because I suddenly decided I needed to become some sort of model Creative Dad who turns every Saturday into an elaborate family craft project. That sounds exhausting for everyone involved. It was simpler than that. Their excitement reminded me how much I still wanted to make things myself. How much I missed following an idea just because I wanted to know where it went. How much I missed learning something new without needing it to advance my career, improve a metric, solve a problem, or become useful in some defensible adult way. And maybe most importantly, it made me think about what I want them to see in me. I want my kids to know adulthood does not have to mean slowly trading every curiosity you have for responsibility. You can be responsible and still make things. People can take care of people and still have interests of your own. You can build a career, raise a family, have obligations, be tired more often than seems medically reasonable, and still decide that imagination deserves some room. I needed that reminder too.

Returning to Creativity Doesn’t Mean Going Back

I think this is the part of returning to creativity that interests me most. I’m not trying to go backward. There is no previous version of me waiting somewhere that I need to recover perfectly. I’m older now. My interests are different. The skills are different. Life’s responsibilities are definitely different. So are the things I want to make. That means rediscovering creativity cannot just be nostalgia. I don’t want to recreate exactly how I thought or worked twenty years ago. I want to take whatever survived those twenty years and see what it can do now. The things we experience while creativity sits quietly in the background still become part of us. Work teaches things. Parenthood teaches things. Failure certainly teaches things, although it tends to use a fairly obnoxious curriculum. All of that comes back with you. So maybe returning is the wrong mental picture. This feels more like continuing something that went quiet for a while.

You are not loading an old save file. You are starting the next part with a much stranger inventory.

That idea is really the heart of The Creative Return. I’m less interested in recreating who I used to be than figuring out what that creative part of me looks like now.

So I’m Making EpicAgain

EpicAgain is my attempt to give all of this somewhere to happen. Not just somewhere to talk about wanting to create. Somewhere to actually create. I want to write more. Build worlds. Tell stories. Paint things. Learn new skills. Explore games and hobbies that catch my attention. Dig into ideas that probably do not need to become anything useful. Try projects that might work and some that almost certainly won’t. I want to document parts of that process too. Not because I think my way of doing any of this will become the definitive method for creative adults everywhere. It won’t. I’m figuring it out. That is part of the point. EpicAgain can be a place for finished things, but I also want it to be a place for the messy middle. The learning. The experiments. The half-formed ideas that become better ideas. The projects that change direction halfway through because the original plan turned out to be terrible. I’ll use What I’m Learning for some of those discoveries, Writing Updates for the stories and worlds taking shape, and Monthly Progress as a place to occasionally look up from the workbench and see whether any of this is actually moving. There should be room for all of it. Because I suspect one of the things that keeps adults from rediscovering creativity is the feeling that we should already be good at whatever we choose to do. Kids generally have no such problem. Adults will avoid trying something for six years because the first attempt might look slightly embarrassing. I would like to get over that.

I Don’t Know Exactly What This Turns Into Yet

There is a temptation when starting something like EpicAgain to pretend the entire map already exists. It doesn’t. I have ideas. Plenty of them, probably more than is useful. But I don’t know exactly which projects will stick. I don’t know which hobbies will become long-term obsessions and which ones will send me enthusiastically buying supplies before quietly disappearing three weeks later. Just like I’ll never know what I will make that I’m genuinely proud of. I also don’t know what I’m going to make that will look ridiculous in hindsight. Probably several things. Good.

I don’t want EpicAgain to become a monument to having everything figured out. I want it to be evidence that I started.

And then kept going. Some weeks that might mean a lot gets made. Other weeks, life will win. That doesn’t mean the whole thing failed. I think I spent too long unconsciously treating creativity as something that required ideal conditions. Enough time. Enough energy. The right setup. A fully developed idea. Permission, apparently, from an imaginary committee that has never once returned my emails. I’m less interested in waiting for that now. Building EpicAgain will be where I document some of this site’s own evolution too, including the parts that change once I actually start using the thing instead of endlessly planning what it could become.

Maybe You Never Lost It Either

If you found this because you are thinking about your own personal creative journey, maybe some of this feels familiar. Maybe there was something you used to make. You wrote stories. Drew constantly. Played music. Built models. Took photographs. Painted. Designed games. Made videos. Invented worlds. Took things apart and rebuilt them into something they were absolutely not intended to become. Then life got bigger. And that part of you got smaller. Or at least quieter. I don’t think the answer is necessarily to blow up your schedule, find six uninterrupted hours every day, and announce to your family that you are now pursuing Art. Most of us probably need something much less dramatic. Make one thing. Pick something back up. Try the hobby you keep watching other people enjoy. Write the page. Paint the miniature. Draw the bad drawing. Build the weird little project nobody asked for. See if that part of you is still there. I have a feeling it probably is. That is what EpicAgain is for me. Not going back. Making something again.

Returning to The Invisible Man by H.G. Wells: The Book That Started My Sci-Fi Rabbit Hole

Posted on by
I’ve read a lot of science fiction since high school. But this is the book that made me start looking for more. The Invisible Man by H.G. Wells was the first science-fiction novel I read cover to cover on my own. I was in high school. I had encountered science fiction before that. Movies, television, games, stories, ideas. But sitting down with a science-fiction novel and actually making it all the way from the first page to the last was different. And when I finished it, I wanted another one. Then another. That sent me backward into the classics of science fiction and eventually much farther down the rabbit hole than one irritated invisible scientist could reasonably have expected. Now I want to go back. Not because I expect The Invisible Man to magically become my favorite science-fiction novel again, assuming it ever really was. I want to see the book that started something.

Before the Rabbit Hole, There Was Griffin

H.G. Wells published The Invisible Man: A Grotesque Romance in 1897, after the story first appeared serially in Pearson’s Weekly. The Morgan Library’s copy of the first edition dates to that same year. The premise is familiar enough now that it barely needs explaining. Griffin is a scientist who discovers how to make himself invisible. Which sounds useful right up until you start thinking about it for longer than thirty seconds. He can make himself invisible, but he cannot simply turn himself visible again. Clothes can still be seen. Food creates practical problems. Weather still exists. Other people remain other people. And Griffin himself is not exactly the sort of man you would ideally hand an extraordinary new power and then leave unsupervised. The basic idea is wonderfully simple. What if someone could become invisible? Wells then spends the novel making that question progressively less convenient. If you have never actually read the original novel, The Invisible Man is available free through Project Gutenberg. It is in the public domain in the United States, which makes revisiting a nineteenth-century classic considerably easier than hunting down the exact copy you once had in high school.

Finishing One Book Made Me Want the Older Ones

The part I remember most clearly isn’t simply the plot. It is what happened afterward. I started looking for more science fiction. More importantly, I started looking backward. There was suddenly this whole older layer of the genre sitting behind the things I already knew. H.G. Wells. Older speculative fiction. The books and writers that helped establish ideas science fiction would spend the next century borrowing, changing, arguing with, and occasionally attaching much larger spaceships to. I didn’t have some grand reading plan. I wasn’t conducting a historical survey of speculative literature. I was a high-school kid who finished a book and thought, basically: What else is there? That may be one of the best questions a book can leave behind.
Sometimes the most important book isn’t the best book you ever read. It’s the one that teaches you where to look next.

There Is Something Weird About Returning to Your First Sci-Fi Novel

The first time I read The Invisible Man, I didn’t have decades of other science fiction sitting behind it. Now I do. That makes going back strange. The first time, Wells was helping establish part of my understanding of what science fiction could be. Now I am returning with everything that came afterward piled into my head. Different books. Different movies. Games. Worlds. Ideas about technology, humanity, faith, power, artificial intelligence, empires, personhood, and all the other subjects science fiction keeps finding new machinery to argue about. So I don’t think the question is simply: Does The Invisible Man still hold up? That is part of it. But I am more interested in something else. Can I still see what made me keep looking?

The Invisible Man Was Already Old When I Found It

There is another strange part of returning to a book like this. The Invisible Man was published in 1897. By the time I encountered Griffin in high school, the idea of an invisible person was hardly new anymore. It had been recycled through films, television, comics, cartoons, superheroes, horror stories, jokes, games, and probably several cereal commercials by then. That creates an odd problem for old science fiction. Sometimes you encounter the descendants before meeting the ancestor. An idea can feel familiar because you’ve already seen dozens of versions of it, even if the original work was doing something startling for its time. So part of rereading Wells means trying to scrape away that century of accumulated invisibility stories and look at what he was actually doing with the idea. Not simply: Invisible man. Neat trick. But: What does invisibility actually do to a person?

The Interesting Part Was Never Just Being Invisible

This is one reason I think the premise has lasted. Invisibility is the hook. Griffin is the problem. Wells doesn’t give an extraordinary ability to a perfectly reasonable man who uses it to sneak into movie theaters and avoid awkward conversations. He gives it to someone ambitious, isolated, increasingly desperate, and willing to push well past the point where most people might reconsider the whole experiment. That turns a technological idea into a human one. Science fiction does this constantly. The technology matters because of what it allows the writer to expose. A machine can change. A society can change. A human body can change. But the people involved still bring themselves along. That complication is a large part of what keeps pulling me back to science fiction now. The best speculative idea isn’t only interesting because it is possible, impossible, futuristic, or weird. It becomes interesting when somebody has to live with it.

I’m Not Going Back to Prove High-School Me Was Right

Nostalgia makes rereading dangerous. You remember how something felt and quietly start demanding that the book recreate the person you were when you first read it. Books are very bad at this. They just sit there. We do all the changing. So I don’t want to reread The Invisible Man simply to confirm that teenage me had impeccable literary judgment. He almost certainly did not. I want to see what is actually there. Maybe parts will feel more dated than I remember. Maybe the language will feel strange. Maybe things I thought were brilliant will seem much simpler now. And maybe parts I barely noticed the first time will turn out to be far more interesting. That’s the point of going back. You cannot read the same book twice because you cannot bring the same reader.
The book has been sitting still. I’m the part of this reread that changed.

The Books That Start Something Get Graded Differently

I think there are several ways a book can become important. Some are simply exceptional books. You finish them and know immediately that you just read something special. Others become important because of what they cause. They send you to another author. They make you browse a different part of the bookstore or library. They introduce a genre that turns into a lifelong interest. They give you a question you keep finding in other stories. They quietly change your creative vocabulary. The Invisible Man belongs in that category for me. I can already name science-fiction stories that have become more important to me in other ways. But this one came first. It opened a door. And what came through that door eventually became part of the reason science fiction still occupies so much space inside EpicAgain.

The Rabbit Hole Eventually Leads Back to Creativity

The interesting thing about looking backward is that connections appear that weren’t obvious while they were happening. One science-fiction novel led to more science-fiction novels. Those led into other worlds, other writers, other ideas, movies, games, settings, and stories. Eventually consuming those worlds starts creating another problem. You want to make things. You start thinking about why fictional societies work the way they do. Why writers choose certain technologies. What makes one imagined history feel enormous while another feels like a collection of encyclopedia entries. What questions you would ask differently. That curiosity is part of what I am returning to through The Creative Return. And it feeds directly into the worldbuilding I am doing now. I don’t think teenage me finished The Invisible Man and immediately began plotting all of that. Life is rarely polite enough to arrange itself into that clean a story. But looking backward, I can see the trail. This book is sitting surprisingly close to the beginning of it.

Returning Doesn’t Mean Trying to Become That Reader Again

This is also where rereading The Invisible Man connects to the bigger idea behind EpicAgain. I am not trying to go backward. I don’t want to recreate high school. I don’t want to read exactly the books I read then and somehow reset the clock. That isn’t really what returning means to me. The useful part of returning is finding something that mattered before and asking what it can become now. Same book. Different reader. Much larger pile of science fiction in between. That seems like a more interesting experiment anyway.

Time to See the Invisible Man Again

I already know what happened after I first finished The Invisible Man. I kept reading science fiction. I went looking for older books. I found more worlds. Eventually those interests became part of how I think about stories and part of what I want to create myself. That history gives Wells’s novel a permanent place for me whether the reread reveals a masterpiece, a fascinating historical artifact, a book with some very visible wrinkles, or some combination of all three. I don’t need it to be exactly what I remember. Actually, I hope it isn’t. There isn’t much point in returning to an old book if the only thing you’re willing to find is your old opinion. I already know where The Invisible Man sent me. Now I want to remember what I actually found there.